Fair pay, please

June 2, 2010 8:02 am

By Vincenzo Rampulla / @VMRampulla

I want a pay rise.

It’s easy to admit that reading yesterday’s Guardian and realising that there are 170 senior civil servants who earn more than £150,000 left me feeling more than a little jealous (especially when you consider that the national average wage is a paltry £21,320).

To put this in context, these civil servants earn more than the Prime Minister’s wage, with the most expensive being the Chief Executive of the Office of Fair Trading who is in the ‘respectable’ bracket of between £275,000-279,999.

Obviously we are all outraged and of course something must be done. Painfully, the coalition government says it is on the case.

But today was just a taster before they seek to publish the job titles and salaries of all civil servants earning over £58,000 next year. If you’re thinking “why are they doing this” then cabinet office minister Francis Maude popping up and rattling off something about wanting to “pull back the curtains to let light into the corridors of power” is all you’re going to get.

And it is at that point that I would say “hold on a minute”. I’m with the general secretary of the FDA union for senior servants who pointed out that “Before this goes further we need to have a serious discussion about what it is ministers are seeking to achieve”; except I’m pretty certain what it is the government is trying to achieve.

This is a massive case of doing the right thing for the wrong reasons. The coalition government is not doing this to champion transparency. It is no surprise that the Conservatives want to cut public spending and need an excuse to keep wages down or cut them.

During the election the Conservatives touted their 20:1 plan for the public sector; that the highest paid should get no more than 20 times more than the lowest paid. And they were clear that the scheme would mean that the policy was “designed to drive down high salaries rather than necessarily increase lower salaries”. Now that the election is over, Will Hutton has been appointed to lead this “commission into fair pay (sic) in the public sector“.

But it is duplicitous to call this a programme for ‘fair pay’ when the objective singly ignores the need to raise the pay of those languishing on low pay. If you look at the private sector the case for change is even greater.

If the bar for a well paid job is the Prime Minister’s salary then how do we feel about the finance director of Gregg’s earning £260k? When we consider that the ratio of pay in the private sector is as much as 80:1 or more then why have the government not appointed the chair of a private sector fair pay commission?

Typically, the government (of this current hue at least) is making a misguided distinction between the private and public sectors, instead of treating them the same. The public sector has benefited from pulling in expertise by offering roughly comparable wages to the private sector. But the private sector has been allowed to accrue a ridiculously top-heavy salary structure.

When it comes to pay we need to go back to first principles. The strength of public anger was palpable when ordinary people realised what bankers in the city paid themselves in bonuses. The calls for windfall taxes and caps of bonuses were unanimous. And the minimum wage was only ever supposed to be an unbreakable legal floor for pay.

So between the criminal and the down right greedy there is the unfair, yet nobody is certain yet how to define it. I’d like to earn £100k+ and be able to buy that Ferrari I’ve always wanted but the key word has to be ‘earn’. Who am I to say that the Finance Director of Gregg’s isn’t worth every penny of his £260k, but is that wage really justified even if it is just on the basis of the ‘going rate’?

I wish Labour in government had done more to tackle the incredible disparity between those who struggle on that minimum wage and those that count their salaries of 6 or more digits. But I’ll settle for a proper fair pay commission now and some real ideas of making pay fairer.

This post was also published on the Young Fabians’ blog.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →