Don’t believe the Ashcroft spin – the momentum is with Ken

8th December, 2011 3:34 pm

Lord Ashcroft’s poll, published on his website and promoted on Conservative Home today, shows that momentum in outer London is with Ken Livingstone.

Of course, it is being spun differently.

One, it is being presented that Labour should be doing better in the byelection. Labour activists should not be sucked into such ruses. A Labour win in a seat that was so hard-fought in 2010 would be very good news.

Two, the spin aims to show that Boris Johnson is on course for a comfortable victory next May, with the poll showing he is one point ahead of Ken Livingstone. If Ken is not ahead in a Labour seat like this, so the argument goes, he cannot win. Lord Ashcroft writes: “Even in what is about to become a safe Labour seat, Boris is running neck and neck with Ken Livingstone.”

But the poll actually shows the momentum is with Ken, in an outer London seat where Boris Johnson won last time. Ken’s vote is up, and up by more than Boris Johnson’s. In the first poll since Ken announced his seven per cent fares cut, the swing in Feltham and Heston is to Ken Livingstone.

In the last London Mayoral election in 2008, Boris Johnson won 41.9% of the vote, compared to Ken’s 37.5%. This poll shows that the two are now neck and neck in Feltham and Heston: 45% to 44% respectively. That means that Ken has added 6.5% to his vote here, and Boris Johnson 3.1%. So the momentum is more than double in Ken’s favour. Overall, that is a 1.7% swing towards Ken. It means that the mayoral race is narrowing towards eye-wateringly close percentages. It leaves Ken just 1.4% short of the swing across London he needs to seize victory. As we can expect that the Tory surge of 2008 in many parts of London will not be repeated mid-term, it shows not merely that the race is going to be nerve-rackingingly close – but that Labour can clearly win.

Ashcroft may think he has done Boris Johnson a favour, but in fact he has shown that the race is wide open and that the momentum is more with Ken than Boris Johnson.

There are plenty of reasons for Ken’s vote to have risen significantly in Feltham and Heston. Overall crime in the borough of Hounslow is up and police numbers have been cut. The number of young victims of knife crime between has risen 13.69% in Hounslow since Boris Johnson was elected. Under Ken Livingstone every electoral ward in London had a ‘safer neighbourhood’ beat police team with a minimum of six officers patrolling the streets – including one sergeant for each team. Under Boris Johnson eight wards in Hounslow have been forced to share a police sergeant: Hounslow central, Hounslow South, Chiswick Riverside, Chiswick Homefields, Osterley and Isleworth, Bedfont, Feltham North, Heston Central & Heston East. The latter four are all in Feltham and Heston.

And on transport, residents have every reason to swing towards Ken Livingstone. The constituency is in zones five and six. Under Boris Johnson a weekly zone 1-6 travelcard is up one fifth under Boris Johnson – from £44.60 in 2008 to £53.40 this coming January. That makes a local resident £457.6 a year worse off under Boris Johnson. A weekly zones 1-5 travelcard will rise by £2.80 in January, up to £49.80. As with all parts of London a single bus has risen 50% under the Tory mayor.

If Seema Malhotra wins in Feltham and Heston it will show the momentum in London is with Labour – and Ashcroft’s poll shows that in the Mayoral election it is with Ken Livingstone.

Tom Copley is a Labour list candidate for the London Assembly

  • Matt C

    Considering how there was a swing towards Labour in the 2010 General Election and then in the following year the SNP managed to gain a majority and the Kirkcaldy parliament seat, demostrates the capacity of the electorate shifting their. Therefore it is unwise to have a ” post hoc ergo propter hoc” mindset when it comes to elections.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1011867393 Ashley Ubrihien

    Great analysis of the polling!

  • M Cannon

    “Always look on the bright side of life!”.  I would have thought that the interesting aspect of the polling is that Labour’s candidate in the by-election got 52% support, compared with 30% for the Conservative and 10% for the Liberal Democrat.

    But when it came to the mayoral election, the Labour candidate (Mr Livingstone) received only 44% support (8% less than the Parliamentary candidate) and the Conservative candidate (Mr Johnson) 45% (15% more than the Parliamentary candidate).

    I would tentatively suggest that this indicates that either (a) the voters of Feltham and Heston are particularly attracted to Labour’s Parliamentary candidate (or they don’t like the Conservative candidate) or (b) they don’t like Mr Livingstone (or are particularly attracted to Mr Johnson).

    If the answer is (b), then Labour have not chosen their candidate wisely.

    • Redshift

      Erm, Boris is far more popular than the Tories. If the answer is b) Labour could very much have still picked their best candidate. 

      As Tom Copley has pointed out. If Boris won in this part of London in 2008 but now finds himself neck and neck, then it shows that things are moving in Ken’s direction. 

  • flyingtrain

    think you need to go over some references here.

    where for example have you go the information that in 2008 Feltham and Heston voted 

    “Boris Johnson won 41.9% of the vote, compared to Ken’s 37.5%”

    or is this the overall london vote?

    I cannot find a breakdown per parliamentary constituency, but if you have this, please post to back yourself up. 

    If it is the entire london vote (and strangely it is very close to this), this must count as some of the worst analysis and spinning i have ever seen.  To say momentum is with ken going on those figures would be embarrassing.  

    • Bill Lockhart

      Answer came there none.

  • Nick

    There is a breakdown by ward available from the London Elects website, which can be used to calculate constituency results. 

  • Pingback: Politics Live blog: Thursday 15 December | Politics News and Discussion()

  • Pingback: Ken Livingstone draws "diving" lines | London-ON.info()

  • Pingback: Ken Livingstone draws "diving" lines – Telegraph Blogs()

  • Pingback: Ken Livingstone and the true blue rosette - World Bad News : World Bad News()

  • Pingback: Ken Livingstone and the true blue rosette - Property Cloud()

  • Pingback: Ken Livingstone and the true blue rosette()

  • Pingback: Politics Live blog: Thursday 15 December | IGV News Online()

Latest

  • Comment Is civic nationalism the way forward for England?

    Is civic nationalism the way forward for England?

    What is striking about the general election in England and Scotland is not just the difference in outcome but emotional tone. In Scotland, burgeoning support for the SNP was not simply about particular policies but an expression of what the sociologist Emile Durkheim called ‘collective effervescence’ – powerful emotional identification with a wider community. By contrast, in England support for the Conservatives seemed based largely on judgments about Labour’s economic competence and fears about SNP influence, with no whiff of […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Why proportional representation will be Labour’s only saviour

    Why proportional representation will be Labour’s only saviour

    Everyone’s whispering about it: the Conservatives pulled a blinder offering the Lib Dems the referendum on changing the voting system at the beginning of the Coalition’s term. Doubtless if it had be run at the same time as the 2015 General Election, things may well have turned out very differently. As it was, Cameron et al made their ‘partner’ show their hand too early; the Lib Dems should have kept those cards closer to their chest in the hope of […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Blairism is no solution to Labour’s identity crisis

    Blairism is no solution to Labour’s identity crisis

    The ‘Blairites’ are certainly right about the so-called 35% strategy. How one envies the SNP for whom every Scottish voter is a target voter. Whatever happened to ‘One Nation Labour’? They are also right to suggest that we should help people fulfil their aspirations but their definition of aspiration is too narrowly focused. It’s one thing to aspire to shop at John Lewis – I might aspire to shop at Fortnum and Mason – but what about those who aspire […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Our human rights are not the Tories’ to give away

    Our human rights are not the Tories’ to give away

    When discussing the Human Rights Act it is important to set out the developments which led to it so as to dispel the falsehood, too often insinuated in the anti-European press, that the Act constitutes the meddling in British affairs by the bureaucracies of the European Union. On 10th December 1948 the U.N. adopted The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in response to the Second World War and the atrocities committed during it. Its purpose was to ensure individuals, without […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Before Labour finds it’s next leader, it needs to find its George Osborne – and fast

    Before Labour finds it’s next leader, it needs to find its George Osborne – and fast

    Here’s a quick challenge for you. It will only take a minute. Try and find a Labour Party blog that praises George Osborne. Nope, me neither. The Chancellor of the Exchequer is understandably not popular within our ranks. After all, the Chancellor has presided over the weakest economic recovery in Britain’s history and unleashed a wave of crippling public expenditure cuts, while doubling the national debt and failing to eliminate the budget deficit. If you were being kind you might […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit