You are here: Home » Comment »

Free School Meals for All is a success – no wonder Gove opposes it

August 2, 2012 11:10 am

Author:

Tags:

Share this Article

Michael Gove is often said to be the most ideologically obsessed education secretary ever.

He is a man on a mission to introduce market forces into the education system in the fevered belief that this will raise standards.  And he isn’t going to let mere evidence and research get in his way.

Nothing could prove this point more strongly than last week’s research published by the highly respected Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) into the Labour Government’s trials of giving all primary school children a free school meal.

The results were very impressive: According to the IFS and NatCen universal free school meals “significantly increased attainment”.  Children in the two pilot areas looked at (County Durham and the London Borough of Newham) made between four and eight weeks extra progress at school than similar children in similar areas.  Over two years of schooling that’s a lot of extra progress.

In addition, the extra number of children eating school meals meant that the consumption of healthy school food increased and the consumption of less healthy snacks, like crisps fell.

In Islington we introduced free school meals for all primary school children a couple of years ago and have kept this programme going despite the massive Tory and Lib Dem cuts to our Council.  One parent in my ward recently told me:

“Feedback from teachers at our children’s primary school suggests that concentration rates are very high and that they feel that this is attributable to the fact that virtually every child in the school gets a balanced, nutritious meal every day. Given that health issues and poor nutrition are so prominent in the recent Islington Public Health report, continuing this policy as long as possible can only help to improve children’s diets and contribute to their well-being”.

The London Borough of Southwark are also introducing free school meals for all and report similar results.

A recent Guardian survey of teachers showed that the Tory-led Government’s cuts, and the recession those cuts have caused, mean more children go to school hungry.  Teachers report that many of these children don’t belong to families who live in poverty and qualify for a free school meal.  Increasingly hungry children come from families on the breadline, just above the income level to qualify for free school meals but still struggling in the current economic climate.

While it is shameful that in our nation in the 21st century children are being held back in schools because of hunger, universal free school meals gives these kids who live on the breadline, not just those in absolute poverty, at least one hot, healthy and nutritious meal a day.  In Islington more than half of those who benefit from the scheme live in a family whose income is under £30,000 a year.

These families on the edge of poverty are usually also on the edge of the labour market and so are doubly helped because free school meals for all also reduces the poverty trap by reducing the benefits lost when someone gets a job. The Government talks about making work pay; universal free school meals is fundamental to that.

So surely this policy is a whole hearted success.  Yes, Labour should have been more radical in Government and introduced free school meals for all instead of just run some pilots, but the policy has been shown to be successful and, one assumes, this Government will now roll it out across the country.

Except that, sadly, Mr Gove is the Secretary of State responsible.

The Department for Education response to the IFS and NatCen report was a loud raspberry. A spokesperson said: “it is not viable to continue the universal pilots in the current financial climate”.

But it is simply wrong to say universal free school meals isn’t affordable.  It is simply a question of how Gove’s Department for Education wishes to spend its money.

The evidence for universal free school meals is clear. The evidence about free schools is very much less clear.

The evidence about effectiveness of free schools is, at best, highly mixed. But perhaps the most telling comments are by the Swedish centre-right education minister Bertil Ostberg, who said: “We have actually seen a fall in the quality of Swedish schools since the free schools were introduced.”

Yet Gove the ideologue pumped in tens of millions to kick start free schools, not least a total of £50m – taken out of an axed technology fund for schools up to April 2011.  £500,000 was given to the New Schools Network to encourage applications to free schools.  The Department for Education said last year that the first 24 schools would cost between £110 and £130 million a year, and this doesn’t even take into account the fact that many of these were opened in temporary buildings and the cost of finding permanent accommodation has not been revealed..

A grand total of £600 million has been put aside for new free school buildings over the next few years.  Of course some of those new school places are needed but many aren’t.

Mr Gove even managed to raise £370,000 from private donors to send a King James bible which is own name on it to every school.  Just imagine how much he could raise to fund a scheme that was actually shown to be effective?

The reality is that there is the money within the Department for Education to fund free school meals for all if a future Labour Government is serious about ending the ineffective vanity projects of the current Secretary of State.

Related posts:

  1. Ed Balls invites local authorities to bid for money for universal free school meals pilots
  2. The free school meals debate shows the lack of commitment to reducing poverty in the new coalition
  3. The free school meals debate shows the lack of commitment to reducing poverty in the new coalition
  4. We can take 50,000 additional children out of poverty this week with an extension of free school meals
  5. Making the (Labour) case for universal free school meals
  • http://twitter.com/robertsjonathan Jonathan Roberts

    It would be easier to assess whether your interesting policy proposal is affordable if you told us what it would actually cost.

    • PeterBarnard

      IFS estimates about £1 bn a year (England only) and this is easily found via the Net, although it would indeed have been better had the author included this in the article itself.

      My own estimate (at £2 a meal) was about £1.2 billion and that wasn’t too difficult to arrive at, either.

      • ThePurpleBooker

        What about for primary schools alone?

  • http://twitter.com/SumitRahman Sumit Rahman

    Just for context, anyone got any idea roughly how much it would cost annually for free school meals for all primary schoolkids in England?

    • externalities

      Apparently it cost £112 per pupil. For 4.1m primary school children in England that comes to £460m. For various reasons it would probably cost less than that, but it’s still a fairly large sum!

      For all 8.1 pupils it comes to £907m.

      Would it be unreasonable to cut child benefit in line with what this would save affluent parents (while increasing child tax credits)?

      • Brumanuensis

        But the benefits accrue to poorer families too, because we know that means-testing reduces take-up amongst targeted groups and stigmatises recipients. So I’d expect uptake to increase among chidren from poorer households as well.

  • Mike Homfray

    Anything is ‘affordable’ but it’s a question of priorities. Gove’s policies are essentially focused on the promotion and creation of a new elite but one which is very narrow in its view of what education is

    • PeterBarnard

      “Anything is ‘affordable’ but it’s a question of priorities.”

      100% correct, Mike. “Politics is the language of priorities.”

      We could make start by taking a look at the squillions paid out in subsidies to private pensions contributions.

  • Hamish

    “A recent Guardian survey of teachers showed that the Tory-led Government’s cuts, and the recession those cuts have caused, mean more children go to school hungry.”
    How could a Guardian survey of teachers show that the Government cuts have caused the recession?
    I am in favour of free meals for all primary school children, but as the article notes, this is something individual councils can implement.
    And as others have commented, there is no such thing as a free lunch.

  • externalities

    “Yes, Labour should have been more radical in Government and introduced
    free school meals for all instead of just run some pilots”

    No, this piloting was an example of good policy-making and Labour should be proud of that. It’s easy to say with hindsight that this trial was successful and reasonably cost-effective but that doesn’t mean such £1bn/year policies should be launched without seeing first if they work, how best to implement them, or if the money could be better spent.

  • ThePurpleBooker

    Let’s be clear about this. The article is very unfair towards free schools. Ruth Kelly introduced trust schools which parents were able to set up. Let’s attack Michael Gove on what matters such as his policies on EMA and BSF but allowing parents to set up new schools is not a bad thing and if Labour was to go into 2015 pledging to shut down good schools such as West London Free School especially those in marginal seats, do you seriously think parents would praise us? We should come up with our own school reforms which are more empowering than anything Gove could dream up.
    Universal free school meals would cost £1bn. I support universal free healthy school meals in primary schools but we have a deficit to cut. David Miliband proposed extending free school meals using £100m currently given to charitable statuses for private schools. I don’t think that is stretching enough. If we abolished Winter Fuel Allowance and instead force all energy companies put pensioners on the lowest tariff and then restricted free TV licence to those on Pension Credit and put accessibility to free bus passes rising with the pension age, then we could save enough money to reverse cuts to foundation years services and introduce universal free healthy school meals in primary schools and any underspend could go to scrapping the ‘granny tax’.

Latest

  • News More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    By Mark Ferguson

    Ed Miliband is addressing Google’s Bug Tent tomorrow, and is expected to attack them over tax avoidance. So the slick Downing Street operation presumably want to get out ahead of that, right? Not quite. Here’s a selection of the headlines from today’s papers: ‘Stop moralising about tax avoidance, PM told’ – Guardian p.23 ‘Tougher tax rules would cost jobs, minister warns’ – Financial Times p.3 ‘Cameron avoids showdown over Google tax row’ – Times p.15 ‘No taxing questions as PM [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    By Harriet Harman

    Most people like to think that we live in a society that is fair and equal but for some it is still not equal at all. When it comes to TV presenters, women disappear when they reach over the age of 50. As part of the work of the Older Women’s Commission, I wrote to the six main UK broadcasters asking them how many older women they employ on screen and behind the camera. The figures provided by broadcasters show [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    By Stefan Stern

    That’s it. Enough is enough. I try to be reasonable. But you can only push somebody so far. It’s time to sort this out once and for all. I am fed up with this huge and growing army of sycophants and cheerleaders constantly bigging up Ed Miliband, and making helpful or supportive interventions on his behalf. The list is endless. Let’s shine a spotlight on the guilty men and women. There’s… well, there’s… er… you know… er… thingy… on a [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    By Rob Marchant

    Last Saturday a senior European politician wrote an article in the British press which made you want to shout at the computer screen. Not such an unusual event, you might think, but this was not a debater’s disagreement as one might have had with the viewpoint of a Tory, a Gaullist or a Christian Democrat. It was one which also left the reader feeling a bit nauseous. And that is because, rather than an honestly-expressed case justified with some evidence, it was [...]

    Read more →
  • News Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Labour proposes teachers spend time in industry “All teachers involved in vocational education would have to spend a period of each year in industry, under Labour plans to integrate further education with emerging skills gaps identified by businesses. The strategy – announced on [...]

    Read more →