Police & Crime Commissioner campaigns – it’s all to play for

August 29, 2012 2:39 pm

As the summer haze begins to disappear, children return to school and swimming costumes are put away for another year, the Westminster village (like Brigadoon) will yawn and wake up. Politics will once again come to dominate the pages of newspapers as sporting achievements begin, like a moon, to wane (notwithstanding the 10 days of Paralympic power and grace that will shake up attitudes to disability and discrimination – I hope).

Whilst we have the shuffle board game on the decks of a large ice bound ship to look forward to, and then the party conferences, we have only a few weeks to go until November 15th when a whole cohort of quasi presidential politicians will be elected to run our local policing and crime services. With the Electoral Reform Society predicting turnouts of less than 20%, there is all to play for. The winners will be the parties who can get their core and new votes out. It is as simple as that. And it is a standing start for pretty well all the political parties as the media have only had muted interest so far. While there has been much #PCC tweeting, most people have yet to know these elections are happening, let alone what the issues are.

If Labour is to win the majority of the PCC positions (and I think that is possible), this is now the time to get organised and get out there! Here are my suggestions for what the campaigns need to address:

We need to nail the Olympic G4S debacle and impending similar police outsourcing on the Tories. Some Tory candidates will try to pretend that they won’t outsource. But we have to make the case loud and clear that they are ideologically wedded to privatisation. And we can no more trust their promises on no police outsourcing as we could not trust their ‘promise’ not to reorganise the NHS and set it up for privatisation. We need to make this election in November a moment when the British people get to have their say on the privatisation of public services – “¡No pasarán!” should be the cry. If you show most people a photo of an epaulet with G4S and Lincolnshire Police side by side – they will shudder. We did not get to vote on the privatisation of the NHS – let us make 15 November a proxy vote to say ‘no!’ then.

We need to talk about the issues that matter to local people and how Labour PCCs will address these effectively. This naturally includes neighbourhood policing, anti-social behaviour and the fear of crime. We need to show that being tough on crime and the causes of crime works – and works well. (See this excellent piece about how New York tackled its crime levels: The transformation of New York City, piece by piece)

We need to build solid links with a whole rainbow of community groups, many of whom will see and suffer what happens if Tory PCCs are elected. These are communities of interest as well as geography. As I wrote before, we need the Trade Unions to be out campaigning and sharing information with their members as well.

We need to be clear about what we should say about second preference votes. A good number of such votes went to minority candidates in the London mayoral elections. I am not sure and perhaps someone has done the maths, but perhaps Ken could have won with just a few more sensibly placed second preference votes. Our manifestos need to address this clearly and loudly.

Now is the time to be garnering celebrity support. I am assuming this is being done at a national level – but local levels will be just as important. Who are the well-known and well respected people in each police area? How can they be brought on board to support local Labour campaigns?

Social media is critical. Of course only a minority of the country are active tweeters but many more are on Facebook on a regular basis. Does each campaign have a social media team to keep the messages out there and up there for people (especially young people) to see? Where are the viral youtube vids?

I think it is fair to say that as yet this impending referendum has not quite gripped the enthusiasm of Labour activists. This is for a whole range of reasons not least that we are very worried about concentrating all this power in the hands of one individual. The costs are another issue of course. But, as I have said before, we are where we are and if we don’t get organised and get out there soon, the Tories will slip almost silently into PCC shoes up and down the country. We cannot let this happen! This election will come only a few months before next May’s elections and the groundwork done for November 15th will help for the next general election – however soon that may be. There are many reasons to make this election a vote to destabilise the coalition. We are not only fighting to get Labour PCCs elected, but we are also fighting the next elections too. As I said before, this is time to pull out the stops.

And we need to deal with all the independent wannabe PCCs whose only refrain is ‘keep politics out of policing’. The short answer is that policing always has been and always will be political. Not of course at the level of who gets investigated etc. But in matters of where resources are allocated and how police are held to account, this is a matter of politics. We have to show how our candidates not only have great credentials to become good political and professional PCCs but also explain how risky it would be to elect independents to positions of great political power where they won’t have the ballast of a movement behind them. This ballast will keep Labour PCCs focused on policing for the many not the few – whereas independents risk being pressure-cooked by the Home Secretary, ACPO or their local Police and Crime Panel.

Each campaign needs a Freedom of Information strategy so that key items of information can be released in time for the election. I am hoping that my request for the G4S / Lincolnshire Risk Register will be resolved before 15/11/12. This has been a long haul and the matter is currently in the hands of the Information Commissioner. But what information needs to be found out locally?

And finally, we need to build common cause with the police service itself – the hard working police officers, staff and volunteers. Many of them are not allowed to be politically active – and many others are not that way inclined. But we need to help those who need helping, to see what the consequences of a Tory PCC will be. They will vote (probably in higher numbers than the general population) – and they have families and friends too. We need their votes.

The elections in November are, put simply, too good an opportunity to get across Labour’s message on policing, community safety and wider public service improvement, to miss. If we let the Tories win, be afraid, be very afraid… These elections can help to Refound Labour.

  • http://twitter.com/RF_McCarthy Roger McCarthy

    Two data points:

    1. Within a week or so of being selected Tory Kent PCCC Andrew McKinlay was boasting on twitter that he had taken delivery of a million items of campaign literature.

    2. ‘Baroness’ Warsi has also claimed that every Tory PCCC has the support of not 0ne but two dedicated staffers from CCHQ – and while anything Warsi says must be taken with a pinch of salt clearly the Tories are spending millions on this campaign nationally.

    And what are Labour doing to support our candidates?

    AFAICT the national party just about committed to pick up the £5,000 deposits  (which adds up to a pretty significant sum – not all of which we will get back) and candidates are having to beg local CLPs, unions and members for any funds they can spare.

    Now I can’t argue that we should spend large sums on what across much of the country will be no more than the coronation of Conservative candidates when we will have a vastly more important general election to fight in less than three years (or even the local elections next May) – but what data I’ve seen indicates that this is already an outrageously uneven playing field and that without at least some national and regional activity November 15th could be a grave embarrassment for us all.

    One thing that could make a difference would be more pressure on the government for a free mailing – but even that I suspect would now benefit the Tories more than us as I very much doubt that some of our southern candidates could afford to pay for even the cheapest leaflet to fill postage paid envelopes in areas that typically average a million voters.

    For a long time Jon has seemed to be virtually a lone voice on PCC campaigning  – I know for instance that he had to improvise  a last minute workshop himself in a corridor at the SE regional conference (which was attended by IIRC 4 or 5 of us) because it did not even occur to the organisers that it should be on the agenda.

    Somebody urgently needs to get a grip on this campaign right now.

    • http://twitter.com/CllrJonSHarvey Cllr Jon Harvey

      I hesitate to reply but I appreciate the feedback.

      I don’t feel alone – I know that Labour PCC candidates are working hard in their localities, helped by some core individuals – as well as work going on centrally. But now is the time to widen and deepen the activity greatly, in my opinion.

      • http://twitter.com/RF_McCarthy Roger McCarthy

        Agree that it’s not that we are doing nothing – it’s just that the Tories seem to be doing and (more importantly) paying for at least a whole order of magnitude more and that their effort is being seriously co-ordinated and led from the centre in a way which ours does not seem to be. 

        Now I can’t altogether see why they are bothering given that their core vote is pretty strong and much more likely to turn out in low turnout local elections than ours anyway without their needing to mailbomb every voter or build up huge bogus twitter followings for their candidates – but the fact is they are ploughing serious resources into the campaign and we can’t just continue running local campaigns on a shoestring if we want a respectable vote on November 15th.

  • Brumanuensis

    I do have one concern about the final proposal. If PCCs are supposed to be the public’s representatives on policing issues, isn’t it imperative that they not get too close to the police service? If they spend a lot of time canvassing serving police officers – who are bound to have a higher than average interest in the elections – doesn’t that render them vulnerable to a form of ‘regulatory capture’?

    One additional caveat: I’m not a fan of the PCC concept, as although crime is obviously a political issue, I’m not convinced issues like the appointment and/or dismissal of a chief constable should be within the remit of one individual, of Party political persuasion. It just seems like an invitation to score-settling and possible petty corruption.

    • http://twitter.com/CllrJonSHarvey Cllr Jon Harvey

      I am not a fan of the PCC concept either: too much power in the hands of one individual. I worry and wait for the first case of inappropriate activity by a PCC…

      The PCCs are not there to regulate the police service – indeed they are specifically required not to get involved in operational matters. That will all still be in the hands of the Chief Constable and rightly so. The IPCC will, of course, still play their part as well. Without doubt people will write to the PCCs to complain about policing and so some clear protocols will need to be worked out early on.

      I am not arguing for direct canvassing police officers and staff – but there are dialogues to be had with Unison, Federation and other staff bodies / unions. In many ways their concerns match ours – cuts, outsourcing etc.

      • Brumanuensis

        Thanks Jon, that’s a helpful answer.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

          Its really much the same relationship the Police Authorities had with the police

          Same basic problem though – the organisation that is being monitored also provides the information needed to make the judgment. I recall well the endless positive and congratulatory reports of successful operations

          Independent member, Merseyside Police Authority 2000-04

  • http://twitter.com/CllrJonSHarvey Cllr Jon Harvey

    For those with an interest, there are several other posts about the campaign on my blog: http://ajustfuture.blogspot.co.uk/ covering my views on who should be in the PCC team, my concerns about the draft Oath as well as my attempts to get the local Tory candidate to say who exactly he works for… (etc.)

  • steven_t_green

    Yawn – why do I keep thinking the best thing to do with these elections no-one wants for posts no-one wants is just to ignore them?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    I think there is little interest in these elections and that we should fight the seats where we can win – but make it clear that when we get elected these posts will be abolished

  • http://twitter.com/CllrJonSHarvey Cllr Jon Harvey

     I rest my case.

  • http://twitter.com/CllrJonSHarvey Cllr Jon Harvey

    With turnouts as low as 18%, not entirely sure which will be the seats “where we can win”. My fear is that there are many seats where we can lose very easily…

  • http://twitter.com/CllrJonSHarvey Cllr Jon Harvey

    And this is one of the reasons why, any incoming Labour PCC needs to think very carefully about who to locate inside their office. Perhaps some existing constabulary functions around strategic performance management & community engagement should switch to being under PCC control? See here for my views about who else might be in the #PCCteam http://ajustfuture.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/the-pcc-team.html

Latest

  • Featured Woolwich: The British people – and our politicians – have risen to the occasion

    Woolwich: The British people – and our politicians – have risen to the occasion

    “We want to start a war” – Woolwich attacker “right now it is only you versus many people, you are going to lose” - Ingrid Loyau-Kennett Only 24 hours ago, news began to trickle through about a barbarous crime, committed on the streets of our capital city, in broad daylight. It seems that the murderers who attacked and brutally murdered a soldier felt they were acting in a way endorsed by their religious beliefs and their god. But to try and [...]

    Read more →
  • News

    Labour NEC Report – 21st May 2013

    Party Organisation The General Secretary (GS) noted the party’s good performance in the recent Local, Mayoral and South Shields elections and thanked all members, activists and staff for their contribution to that success. The committee discussed the work of Blue State Digital who have been brought in to revolutionise the party’s use of new and social media as part of our suite of campaign tools. It was noted that Matthew McGregor, Head of Blue State Digital’s London Office and former [...]

    Read more →
  • News Labour’s London Assembly Leader responds to Woolwich attack

    Labour’s London Assembly Leader responds to Woolwich attack

    Following yesterday’s attack in Woolwich, Leader of the Labour Group on the London Assembly Len Duvall AM said: “The attack in Woolwich was horrific, the actions of local people in response and the head-teacher and staff at the school are a reflection of the values and strength of our community. “At this afternoon’s London Assembly Police and Crime Committee questions will be asked about yesterday’s attack and the response, and at a future assembly meeting we will come together to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment If Labour is to build One Nation, it must be a safe and equal one for women

    If Labour is to build One Nation, it must be a safe and equal one for women

    Today End Violence Against Women (EVAW) releases a new report auditing the Government’s progress in acting to prevent violence against women and girls. And with the revelations from Operation Yewtree and group exploitation cases set to roll on for many months , we hope the response from Parliament, policy-makers and the media will be unanimous : that prevention must be at the top of the priority list for any government, of any colour, from now on. On that basis, it’s [...]

    Read more →
  • News The theories that will occupy security forces after Woolwich – Media roundup: May 23rd, 2013

    The theories that will occupy security forces after Woolwich – Media roundup: May 23rd, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Woolwich – the theories that will occupy security forces “Counter-terrorism officers and security officials will doubtless fear that Woolwich fits into the category of crime that they can do little to thwart; random, lone-wolf, unsophisticated attacks, conducted by people who are not [...]

    Read more →