Letters to the Editor – week ending 7 June 202

Gordon Cragg / GVI Post Box. Hadley, Telford / CC BY-SA 2.0
Gordon Cragg / GVI Post Box. Hadley, Telford / CC BY-SA 2.0

Read what people have been writing to our editor about this week. Find out how to share your own views here.

 

Democracy and Inequality 

Hi

There is only one way for public ownership to succeed, and any other method that achieved it can be undone by an incoming government that disagreed with it.

We need public ownership of our democracy, in the same way that the Swiss own their democracy.

Only then will we have public ownership at the level that the electorate want it.

Democracy should be regarded as an essential public utility, the current alternative will mean we will continue as we are until disaster strikes.

Steve Nicholson

*****

To reverse the bias between old and young, retired people should continue to pay NI contributions (without any employer ones) instead of changes to the triple lock. Older people have more NHS/care needs so that would be fair and as a person in my 80s I support that.
Young people could then be exempt NI in work up to the age of 24. Or the Labour NI increase for employers be revoked which is restricting job recruitment for all ages and sectors. Before registering for new apprenticeships, they need work experience (minimum of one month) to see if their choice was the right option before taking on the longer commitment. Vocational courses have been underfunded for decades, and fresh incentives are needed for business support to give young people an opportunity to start work.
David Murray,
Wolverhampton

Questions for Andy

 

Dear Editor,

I watched Andy Burnham’s performance on Question Time, and I can’t say I share the view that it was a strong performance.

Andy did nothing to dispel the myth that there is a two tier policing system operating in the UK, and was instead happy to focus only on the apparent success of Manchester in tackling knife crime, which was rather blowing his own trumpet.

The problem is, as Kier Starmer has rightly pointed out, we do not have a two tier policing system. The popular belief in circulation, which is gaining traction after Henry Nowak murder, is that white people are at a disadvantage as far as policing is concerned. The Independent Reviews of this just don’t support the myth, and it’s incumbent upon all MPs to try and stick to the facts, not just go with the crowd. It’s much too dangerous a myth to ignore if you follow through to its logical conclusion and leads to the sort of behaviour we saw play out in Southampton. It’s also worth pointing out that knife crime has fallen pretty much across all of the country and Manchester is not exceptional, as Andy was apparently suggesting.

If Andy wins in Makerfield against the Reform candidate to me it wouldn’t prove much as he is clearly not much of an opponent. I could believe Farage is happy with a hopeless candidate being in place as he would be far more happy with seeing a divisive Leadership struggle and Starmer removed than his candidate winning. We would be kidding ourselves to think there would not be an immediate call for a General Election, which in the current febrile atmosphere, Labour would probably lose.

But more worrying than that is Andy’s unwillingness to defend the facts.

Best Regards

Tony Evans

*****

I watched the debate last night and wasn’t convinced by anyone.

Yes, Andy is articulate but it is clear to me that he is furthering his own career more than saving the Labour Party. He didn’t speak up when the woman announced she hated Keir Starmer etc.

Why does everyone hate Keir Starmer? How quickly are they going to hate Andy Burnham when he finds he can’t control his back benchers, the financial situation and the press?

As for the people of Makerfield they are going to elect a Labour MP who will abandon them asap to become PM. And then there’s his mayoralty which is likely to go to Reform.

Country first? I don’t think so.

Sue Hillman

SHARE: If you have anything to share that we should be looking into or publishing about this story – or any other topic involving Labour– contact us (strictly anonymously if you wish) at [email protected].

  • SUBSCRIBE: Sign up to LabourList’s morning email here for the best briefing on everything Labour, every weekday morning.
  • DONATE: If you value our work, please chip in a few pounds a week and become one of our supporters, helping sustain and expand our coverage.
  • PARTNER: If you or your organisation might be interested in partnering with us on sponsored events or projects, email [email protected].
  • ADVERTISE: If your organisation would like to advertise or run sponsored pieces on LabourList‘s daily newsletter or website, contact our exclusive ad partners Total Politics at [email protected].

More from LabourList

Become a Friend

Support independent Labour journalism – for just £4.99 a month!

If you value what we do, become a Friend of LabourList today.