Proposal #24: Re-nationalise the railways

September 25, 2009 12:05 am

BRBy David Stuttle

Among all great benefits to the development of the civilised world that Britain has created and established, the invention of the railway must rate as the greatest. From its inception in the nineteenth century through to high speed trains in the twenty-first the Railway has been the foremost method of transport throughout the world.

The railway in Britain developed rapidly from a few small local lines carrying mainly freight to a network of passenger and freight lines covering the entirity of the British Isles. As some railway companies grew in commercial stature and financial strength they took over and incorporated other smaller lines and companies.

In 1921, by Act of Parliament, the big four were created: LNER, LNWR, Southern and GWR became operational in 1923. But they were still private companies, competing with each other and operating to make profits for their shareholders. This situation was not viable for long as investment in improvements and new locomotion became too expensive for the companies.

The shortcomings of the private railway network became apparent during WWII, as services became less efficient and equipment frequently failed. To stop the total decline of the railway network – one of the best in the world in its heyday – the post war Labour government nationalised the railways and brought them into public ownership in 1948.

Nationalisation allowed for huge investment in the Permanent Way and in those new and more efficient locomotives, as well as the upgrading of rolling stock. A new system of ticketing was brought in that enabled the passenger to buy one ticket for the whole journey instead of having to buy separate tickets from each company for the section of the journey travelled on that company’s lines.

We would still have a national railway network to be proud if two acts of folly had not been perpetrated by Conservative governments. The first was the decimation of the rail network following the Beeching Report in 1963. This travesty allowed the Tory-led road lobby to gain power at the expense of the railways. Many branch lines and freight lines were closed in the sweeping cuts that followed the adoption by the Conservatives of Dr. Beeching’s recommendations.

As a result we have spent countless millions on an overcrowded road structure that has never been capable of accommodating the volume of traffic wanting to use it. We have huge, fuel-inefficient, pollution-producing lorries travelling long distances, each carrying a tiny fraction of the goods that could be transported by rail. Often these lorries are travelling on roads that run parallel to railway lines. There are now more private cars on the roads than ever envisaged because for most of the people there is no longer a railway station near their homes. And the buses are as infrequent as snow in July. One of the strong arguments put forward at the time of the Beeching cuts was that busses would replace the trains. It never happened. Bustitution did not work.

The second act of folly by a Conservative government was the privatisation of the railways. Having failed to invest in the railway the Tory government under Mrs. Thatcher sold off one of our biggest national assets. But just like the effect of cutting the railways under Beeching, privatisation has not worked either. Companies set up to run different parts of the railway system have under-invested in their service provision and equipment. Millions of pounds of public money has been handed over to the privatised companies to keep them afloat, while fare prices have escalated, passenger numbers have dropped and shareholders have profited. Inefficiencies have increased and accidents like the one at Hatfield are all too common.

The only way to bring our railway network back into the supreme transport system it once was and make it a beacon of excellence to the world is to re-nationalise it. A nationalised railway network will:

* Invest in re-opening closed lines and open new routes to attract more custom.

* Create employment.

* Invest in additional and new rolling stock to add carriages to trains and enable all passengers to sit for the whole of their journey, including commuters during peak times.

* Run at a lower cost without needing to make a profit.

* Reduce fares for travellers and thus encourage more people to travel by train.

* Reduce the number of cars on the road.

* Carry more freight and cut out all the HGV traffic on the roads. Only smaller LGV lorries will be needed to carry goods from railheads for local delivery.

* Eliminate the need for building new roads.

* Have a more efficient timetable so that passengers do not have long waits between connections.

It is time the Labour Party returned to its socialist roots. One step along the way would be to re-nationalise public services: telephone, energy, water, buses and first and foremost, the railway network.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →