Organising for Labour. Organising to win

July 16, 2010 2:12 pm

Author:

ObamaorganiserBy Sam Tarry / @samtarry

‘Community Organising’ has been a buzz phrase of the Labour leadership election campaign so far. A term in vogue ever since Obama’s victory in the states, but perhaps one often misused or misunderstood – with different models of organising in operation here in the UK, some effective in different ways and less so in others, a lot needs to be explained, especially from a Labour Party point of view.

There has been much talk about Labour’s lost supporters in the wake of May’s general election defeat. Whereas once the party seemed preoccupied with keeping ‘Middle England’ inside the Labour tent, there is now a recognition that the party lost because so many of its traditional voters deserted it, either by staying at home or by voting for another party. This is not a new development. Labour has been losing its core vote for many years. In some areas of the country this is manifesting itself in the rise of the British National Party. In other places it is the Liberal Democrats or independents who are benefiting. More usually, however, many traditional Labour voters are simply staying at home.

The reasons for the abandonment of Labour are numerous and will be debated in other arenas. There have undoubtedly been policy shortcomings, Labour’s focus has been elsewhere and there is a general feeling that the party lost its way domestically as it became mired in international conflicts. More importantly, however, is the sense among many of its lost voters that Labour no longer represents them. Whereas once these voters would look to Labour to protect them in times of need they now feel abandoned, isolated and increasingly resentful. Coinciding with their own loss of identity and belonging, these voters have ditched Labour. How the party reconnects with these voters is the key question of this leadership election.

The next leader of the party will have a unique opportunity to take advantage of their new position. A total review of our organisation is needed. The existing structures of the party, its processes for making policy and the way it campaigns are all based on the party in government, often overtly as with the “Partnership in Power” process. These things will need to be adapted for opposition and for new political times, techniques and technologies. We need to learn the lessons of the general election – both the failures and the successes.

The party itself will always see winning elections as a central purpose, but it cannot be successful in doing so without a widening of its aims and how we achieve them. Our mission as a party is surely to create a proper grassroots organisation that values and involves members and supporters with the aim of leading our communities outside of elected structures as well as within them and using both to complement the other. To do that, party structures have to change.

We have seen that the grassroots power of ‘community organising’ can lead to monumental results, as Hope not hate demonstrated across the country and particularly in Barking in Dagenham where over 1500 individuals joined the campaign trail alongside hundreds of local residents, churchgoers, trade unionists, community groups and party members to deliver the most resounding electoral defeat of the far right in modern times – Labour 51- BNP 0. Demonstrating the key borough-wide role is the fact that the margin of victory in the Barking and Dagenham sides of the borough only differed by an average 50 votes. Stoke, Sandwell, Burnley, Oldham and many other places attest to the scale and depth of mobilisation against the far right.

Building on the huge European election effort the year before, which despite the collapse of the Labour vote leading to Griffin and Brons taking seats, the campaign dwarfed the Labour partys campaign in some areas and mobilised almost as any activists as some of the main political partys. During the general election the pioneering work being carried out in Oxford East and Birmingham Edgbaston or even Walthamstow demonstrated that the Labour Party is able to use similar models of organising to motivate, empower and involve a far wider range of people than just the paid up party members. Indeed to actually recruit fresh members and get them campaigning in a much more effective way – entrenched in and acting on behalf of – the communities that they sought to win support from. The question facing the Labour Party is how this can be mainstreamed into every day campaigning up and down the country.

In the words of Jon Cruddas MP, seen by many as a potential Howard Dean figure who could lead a rejuvenation of the party’s grassroots and a radical shake up of its structures: “Now we need to rediscover our campaigning traditions of democracy and socialism, and build a grass-roots movement for a new covenant between the people and Labour.”

Sam Tarry, National Chair of Young Labour.

Sam works as a campaign organiser for Labour Friends of Searchlight and Hope not hate.

————————————————————————————————

‘Organising to Win’ – An Invitation to Saturday’s Conference

Full details and registration here:

“I’m a great believer in taking action not just talking – thats why I have spent the past few weeks arranging a conference taking place this Saturday that I would like to invite all LabourList readers to come and take part in. ‘Organising to win’ takes place tomorrow at the University of London Union, on Malet Street London. This conference is, I believe, part of beginning the process of renewing our party at the grassroots. We will hear key note speeches from Jon Cruddas MP, Devin Burghart from the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights, Seattle on how the ‘Tea Party’ movement in the US captured the organising agenda, skills training workshops, debates on what type of organising works, and we will have a debate between the leadership candidates on their vision of how Labour reconnects with communities.

Hope to see you there

Sam”

Full conference Agenda and Programme here.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Featured Latest Ashcroft poll shows Labour making ground in England – but facing wipeout in Scotland

    Latest Ashcroft poll shows Labour making ground in England – but facing wipeout in Scotland

    After the Ashcroft constituency poll of Scottish seats exactly a month ago I said that Scottish Labour is going down in flames, and taking Miliband’s chances of a majority with it. Today’s latest Ashcroft poll has done nothing to put out those flames, or suggest Scottish Labour is performing anything other than a catastrophic nosedive. Except now it almost feels like everyone has adjusted to the “new normal” whereby a Labour heartland is now a Labour wasteland. We’ll get back […]

    Read more →
  • News Video Broadcasters to Cameron: Tell us a date you can do for head-to-head debate

    Broadcasters to Cameron: Tell us a date you can do for head-to-head debate

    Broadcasters appear to be losing their patience with David Cameron’s attempts to get out of appearing the pre-election TV debates. It is widely understood that Cameron has been advised by strategist Lynton Crosby not to take part in the leaders’ debates and has been dragging his feet during negotiations, making more debates each time broadcasters make new proposals. Following the initial invitation of UKIP to appear, Cameron claimed that the Green Party should also take part. Now the Greens, SNP […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Tactical voting: unless we are an open tribe, we will die

    Tactical voting: unless we are an open tribe, we will die

    So Compass holds a debate about the relevance, or not, of tactical voting in the run up May and straight away John Spellar MP and then Luke Akehurst are on to us. John accused us of calling on people ‘not to vote Labour”, Luke says we are ‘naïve’. Well first lets be clear: we have set up the space on our website for a debate; we have one article for tactical voting and one against. We wanted to see what […]

    Read more →
  • News Cooper says “slippery” Farage’s immigration speech will increase division

    Cooper says “slippery” Farage’s immigration speech will increase division

    Yvette Cooper has accused Nigel Farage of attempting to exploit concerns about immigration rather than attempting to come up with practical policies. The Shadow Home Secretary also derided UKIP for getting themselves in a “ridiculous tangle” on the issue – last week a spokesperson for the party said they would introduce a net migration target of 50,000, while Farage today claims that it is not party policy. This follows Ed Miliband attacking David Cameron for missing his 2010 immigration promises […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured PMQs Verdict: Nevermind what Cameron said – it’s what he wouldn’t say that matters

    PMQs Verdict: Nevermind what Cameron said – it’s what he wouldn’t say that matters

    There are only three PMQs left until the election. Three more of these turgid, unattractive, unedifying and borderline pointless sessions to sit through before May. If this is the highlight of the Parliamentary week then Parliament can’t prorogue quick enough, frankly. Evidently many MPs feel the same, judging by the wide open spaces on the green benches this lunchtime. After a few minutes MPs had all spaced themselves out a little bit to make the place look a bit less […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit