Organising for Labour. Organising to win

July 16, 2010 2:12 pm

Author:

Share this Article

ObamaorganiserBy Sam Tarry / @samtarry

‘Community Organising’ has been a buzz phrase of the Labour leadership election campaign so far. A term in vogue ever since Obama’s victory in the states, but perhaps one often misused or misunderstood – with different models of organising in operation here in the UK, some effective in different ways and less so in others, a lot needs to be explained, especially from a Labour Party point of view.

There has been much talk about Labour’s lost supporters in the wake of May’s general election defeat. Whereas once the party seemed preoccupied with keeping ‘Middle England’ inside the Labour tent, there is now a recognition that the party lost because so many of its traditional voters deserted it, either by staying at home or by voting for another party. This is not a new development. Labour has been losing its core vote for many years. In some areas of the country this is manifesting itself in the rise of the British National Party. In other places it is the Liberal Democrats or independents who are benefiting. More usually, however, many traditional Labour voters are simply staying at home.

The reasons for the abandonment of Labour are numerous and will be debated in other arenas. There have undoubtedly been policy shortcomings, Labour’s focus has been elsewhere and there is a general feeling that the party lost its way domestically as it became mired in international conflicts. More importantly, however, is the sense among many of its lost voters that Labour no longer represents them. Whereas once these voters would look to Labour to protect them in times of need they now feel abandoned, isolated and increasingly resentful. Coinciding with their own loss of identity and belonging, these voters have ditched Labour. How the party reconnects with these voters is the key question of this leadership election.

The next leader of the party will have a unique opportunity to take advantage of their new position. A total review of our organisation is needed. The existing structures of the party, its processes for making policy and the way it campaigns are all based on the party in government, often overtly as with the “Partnership in Power” process. These things will need to be adapted for opposition and for new political times, techniques and technologies. We need to learn the lessons of the general election – both the failures and the successes.

The party itself will always see winning elections as a central purpose, but it cannot be successful in doing so without a widening of its aims and how we achieve them. Our mission as a party is surely to create a proper grassroots organisation that values and involves members and supporters with the aim of leading our communities outside of elected structures as well as within them and using both to complement the other. To do that, party structures have to change.

We have seen that the grassroots power of ‘community organising’ can lead to monumental results, as Hope not hate demonstrated across the country and particularly in Barking in Dagenham where over 1500 individuals joined the campaign trail alongside hundreds of local residents, churchgoers, trade unionists, community groups and party members to deliver the most resounding electoral defeat of the far right in modern times – Labour 51- BNP 0. Demonstrating the key borough-wide role is the fact that the margin of victory in the Barking and Dagenham sides of the borough only differed by an average 50 votes. Stoke, Sandwell, Burnley, Oldham and many other places attest to the scale and depth of mobilisation against the far right.

Building on the huge European election effort the year before, which despite the collapse of the Labour vote leading to Griffin and Brons taking seats, the campaign dwarfed the Labour partys campaign in some areas and mobilised almost as any activists as some of the main political partys. During the general election the pioneering work being carried out in Oxford East and Birmingham Edgbaston or even Walthamstow demonstrated that the Labour Party is able to use similar models of organising to motivate, empower and involve a far wider range of people than just the paid up party members. Indeed to actually recruit fresh members and get them campaigning in a much more effective way – entrenched in and acting on behalf of – the communities that they sought to win support from. The question facing the Labour Party is how this can be mainstreamed into every day campaigning up and down the country.

In the words of Jon Cruddas MP, seen by many as a potential Howard Dean figure who could lead a rejuvenation of the party’s grassroots and a radical shake up of its structures: “Now we need to rediscover our campaigning traditions of democracy and socialism, and build a grass-roots movement for a new covenant between the people and Labour.”

Sam Tarry, National Chair of Young Labour.

Sam works as a campaign organiser for Labour Friends of Searchlight and Hope not hate.

————————————————————————————————

‘Organising to Win’ – An Invitation to Saturday’s Conference

Full details and registration here:

“I’m a great believer in taking action not just talking – thats why I have spent the past few weeks arranging a conference taking place this Saturday that I would like to invite all LabourList readers to come and take part in. ‘Organising to win’ takes place tomorrow at the University of London Union, on Malet Street London. This conference is, I believe, part of beginning the process of renewing our party at the grassroots. We will hear key note speeches from Jon Cruddas MP, Devin Burghart from the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights, Seattle on how the ‘Tea Party’ movement in the US captured the organising agenda, skills training workshops, debates on what type of organising works, and we will have a debate between the leadership candidates on their vision of how Labour reconnects with communities.

Hope to see you there

Sam”

Full conference Agenda and Programme here.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Cutting Trident will be the price of support in a hung parliament. That’s the news reported from a meeting of the SNP, Plaid Cymru and Green leaders this week. With Labour’s slim lead and the SNP and Green vote threatening to impact on its share, this is a serious issue. Labour’s policy clearly states, ‘Labour has said that we are committed to a minimum, credible independent nuclear deterrent, delivered through a Continuous At-Sea Deterrent. It would require a clear body […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Lord Ashcroft has told him he shouldn’t have done it in 2010. Lynton Crosby has told him not to do it in 2015. It’s no surprise that David Cameron is trying to wriggle out of televised leader debates during the General Election – even though he has said he is willing to take part “in principle”. Time perhaps to dust off one of Margaret Thatcher’s favourite barbs “He’s frit.” Neil Kinnock tried it in 1992 to try to goad John Major into […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    By Stephen Timms MP and Ian Murray MP The Christmas period reminds us that modern life can be busy, hurried and demanding. The pressures of work, demands of family life and hectic Christmas schedules can prove stretching as we juggle competing demands. Increasingly the need for flexible work is driven by the complex shape of people’s lives; as parents go to work, struggle to make ends meet, perform career roles, take their children to school and activities and try and carve […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    As the start of the long campaign begins today, curbing the amount of money parties can spend between now and May 7th, Labour MP Jon Ashworth has sought to clarify what precautions are being taken to ensure publicly-funded government advisers are not using their time campaigning. Ashworth has sent a letter to senior civil servant Jeremy Heywood, asking him to answer a number of questions about what kind of campaigning activity was permitted and undertaken by special advisers (SpAds) in […]

    Read more →
  • News Berger asks Twitter to do more to stop use of racist words

    Berger asks Twitter to do more to stop use of racist words

    Luciana Berger, Shadow Minister for Public Health, has called on Twitter to do more the stop racist terms being used on the site. Berger has herself faced a large amount of anti-semitic abuse on the site, and in October Garron Helm  was jailed for sending her a torrent of anti-semitic messages. Berger told the Telegraph (£): “At the height of the abuse, the police said I was the subject of 2,500 hate messages in the space of three days using […]

    Read more →