A Living Wage for all should be Labour’s mission

31st January, 2013 3:51 pm

Last week The Resolution Foundation and the IPPR published a joint report  “Beyond the Bottom Line”, which outlined various options for how a Living Wage could be rolled out across the country.  The report is excellent in almost every way, at last providing detail and context for those who want to see a Living Wage delivered to much larger groups of people.  But whilst I’d agree with the vast majority of its sensible recommendations, this otherwise thorough report does contain a suspiciously shaky conclusion on the issue of a statutory Living Wage.

On Twitter and the Labour blogosphere it was this conclusion which received most attention.  The report’s authors repeatedly and very firmly insist government should not be in the business of enforcing a universal, legal Living Wage.  As far as I can tell, this is based on two main arguments:

  1. That a statutory Living Wage would cost jobs
  2. That a statutory Living Wage would undermine the voluntaristic  principles of the Living Wage campaign

Let’s take these in turn. When you dig a little deeper into the report, you find that their forecasts for the impact on jobs are accompanied by some eye-watering caveats.  The report states that introducing such a measure would lead to a pay rise for 4 million workers, but “overall labour demand would fall by 160,000.” But how about this for a qualification?

This is an extreme “worst case scenario” (a similar model would have predicted job losses from the National Minimum Wage (NMW), which we now know did not happen) but it confirms that we should not legislate for a statutory living wage, an option which, in any case, few Living Wage activists advocate.  

Or put another way, “When our model was tested in the real world, it proved to be very seriously flawed.” Reason enough, some might think, to alter the conclusion.

Andy Harrop of the Fabian Society points out in his piece on the Living Wage, that most evidence suggests that  “higher wages do not destroy jobs (except perhaps for young people, who might need to be exempted at first)”.  In addition, we should be mindful of the probable economic stimulus of increasing wages for the lowest paid.  My own union UNISON recently made this argument in our submission to the 2012 Low Pay Commission.  There clearly needs to be more work done on this issue, but I would be very wary of taking the IPPR/Resolution Foundation report as the final word on the jobs vs Statutory Living Wage argument.  The evidence they produce, by their own admission, is weak.

So let’s turn to the second reason given for avoiding a statutory Living Wage: that it would undermine the voluntaristic approach which has been so successful for Living Wage campaigners.  The argument goes, that the moral power of a Living Wage relies, in part, on the fact that it has developed out of civil society rather than being imposed by the state.

I would agree that it has been the voluntary work of low paid workers, churches, trade unions and community campaigners which has put this issue on the political agenda in the first place.  The only reason we are debating this issue now, is because thousands of people have applied pressure to employers to pay workers above the poverty threshold.

Yet  I simply do not understand why moving the Living Wage to a statutory footing would undermine its moral weight.  Corporation taxes are statutory, but look at the moral outrage directed at Starbucks, Amazon and others who are perceived to have unfairly avoided paying their full share.  Or what about the National Minimum Wage itself?  Even with the heavy hand of the state behind it, the NMW has tremendous moral purchase.  If it didn’t, why would the Government be issuing press releases to “name and shame” those who have dodged paying it?  Being seen to have breached a moral code is powerful, but being seen to have done so, whilst also breaking the law is usually seen as doubly so.

There are numerous examples of campaigns which develop within civil society and have then been adopted by governments and implemented, universally, through legislation.  Not everybody campaigning for the provision free healthcare and education prior to the 1945 Labour Government wanted to see the NHS and state schools introduced, but thank goodness they were.

We should be looking at this debate from the point of view of the private sector cleaner, living in a rural community, being paid poverty wages and working for an employer which will never receive the attention of a Living Wage campaign nor be tempted by an incentive system administered by a progressive local authority.  This worker deserves to be paid a Living Wage just as much as any other.  Yet, without a statutory Living Wage, we would essentially be condemning this person and their family to a life of poverty.  That cannot be right.

I would agree with the IPPR and Resolution Foundation, that momentum needs to be built in sectors of economy where the Living Wage has hardly penetrated.   Individual campaigns within particular employers, particularly in the private sector, will help to win over more hearts and minds to the campaign and make a strong manifesto commitment from Labour on this issue more attractive to the electorate.

But above all, we have to ensure that the next stage of the Living Wage campaign is a One Nation solution, making sure nobody is left behind in the fight against poverty pay.

Gavin Edwards is a National Officer for UNISON. UNISON’s Living Wage Campaign page can be found here

To report anything from the comment section, please e-mail [email protected]
  • Hamish Dewar

    Rather than trying to put the Living Wage on a statutory basis, it would be simpler to raise the Minimum Wage. No need for more legislation.

    • MonkeyBot5000

      And raise the personal tax allowance so people on the minimum wage don’t pay tax at all.

      Unfortunately, the massive help that would provide to people like me would also provide a very small benefit to rich people so rich Labour commentators are against it.

      They’d happily cut off my nose to spite someone else’s face.

      • Dave Postles

        A progressive tax regime would rectify that anomaly. I do hope that whatever benefit you have enjoyed from the increase in the personal allowance is not cancelled by the stupidity of the new council tax system. The LibDems give with one hand and their Coalition partners take away with the other, with hardly a whimper from the LibDems.

      • JoeDM

        That would be the sensible approach.

        • Gavin Edwards

          Hamish – I agree. Perhaps I could have made that clearer. My personal view is that we should be making a long-term commitment, perhaps over a 7-10 year period to merge the the Living Wage and the NMW. The Low Pay Commission should be given a revised remit and re-branded as the “Living Wage Commission”.

  • robertcp

    I disagree. A statutory Living Wage is unrealistic, although the Labour Party and trade unions should make sure that as many people as possible are paid it.

  • Pingback: Living wage – Ecuador shows the way | Left Futures()

  • Pingback: Don’t be derailed by Progress confrontation | Left Futures()

  • Jane Holgate

    Where does this argument come from – can you provide some references please – interested to see who is arguing this —- ‘The argument goes, that the moral power of a Living Wage relies, in
    part, on the fact that it has developed out of civil society rather than
    being imposed by the state’

Latest

  • Featured News LIVEBLOG: shadow cabinet resignations: Corbyn releases statement

    LIVEBLOG: shadow cabinet resignations: Corbyn releases statement

    Almost a dozen shadow cabinet members have resigned today after Hilary Benn was sacked last night. Corbyn’s decision to bin the Shadow Foreign Secretary came after it was reported Benn was talking to his colleagues about removing Jeremy Corbyn after the EU referendum result. We’ll be bringing you all the shadow cabinet news as it comes through. 22.21 For LabourList’s quick recap of the day, click here. There are rumours swirling around there will further resignations tomorrow which might threaten Corbyn’s ability to fill all positions […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Corbyn issues message of defiance as 11 quit shadow Cabinet

    Corbyn issues message of defiance as 11 quit shadow Cabinet

    Jeremy Corbyn has vowed to stay on as Labour leader and said he will not “betray the trust” of members despite suffering 11 shadow Cabinet resignations in a day. Heidi Alexander led the departures following the sacking of Hilary Benn in the early hours this morning for organising opposition to Corbyn’s leadership. She was joined by Gloria De Piero, Vernon Coaker, Lucy Powell, Seema Malhotra, Ian Murray, Lilian Greenwood, Kerry McCarthy, Charles Falconer, Karl Turner and Chris Bryant, all of […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured The plot to oust Corbyn is anti-democratic and offensive to Labour members

    The plot to oust Corbyn is anti-democratic and offensive to Labour members

    Here in Yorkshire, Labour voters and Labour members have been asking me what on earth some of our Labour MPs are up to. They are telling me that they just don’t understand why, with the Conservative Government up to its neck in trouble, the priority of some Labour MPs appears to be to make divisions in the Parliamentary Labour Party front-page news and engineer a coup against the democratically elected Labour Party Leader. They feel that some Labour MPs are […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured What’s going on with the anti-Corbyn plot?

    What’s going on with the anti-Corbyn plot?

    “You up? Call me, I have a big story for you.” That was the text I received just after one o’clock this morning. Within minutes, it was public that Hilary Benn had been sacked as Shadow Foreign Secretary. That began a chain of events that, since Heidi Alexander’s resignation just after 8am, have moved at some breakneck speed. At the time of writing, eight Shadow Cabinet minister have gone: Hilary Benn, Heidi Alexander, Ian Murray, Seema Malhotra, Kerry McCarthy, Lilian Greenwood, […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Labour is facing “political oblivion” with Corbyn as leader – Labour MPs circulate anti-Corbyn letter to colleagues

    Labour is facing “political oblivion” with Corbyn as leader – Labour MPs circulate anti-Corbyn letter to colleagues

    Margaret Hodge, former minister, and Ann Coffey, MP for Stockport, have said that Labour is looking at “political oblivion” with Jeremy Corbyn as leader, in a letter that has been circulated around the Parliamentary Party. The two Labour MPs submitted a motion of no confidence against Corbyn after they said he didn’t give a clear enough message on the EU referendum. They have hit out at the leader again in a letter (below) and said that Corbyn is “standing in […]

    Read more →
x

LabourList Daily Email

Everything Labour. Every weekday morning

Share with your friends










Submit