Launching “Labour’s Business”

November 28, 2011 8:26 am

By Alex Smith and Luke Bozier

Since the credit crunch, it’s become unfashionable in the Labour Party to praise capitalism. The mood in our movement towards wealth creation and enterprise has taken a decidedly negative turn. Many people are rightly upset at the recklessness we’ve seen in the financial services industry; stubbornly high unemployment and low growth add fuel to that fire. But while much of that frustration is warranted, Labour as a party must be careful not to throw out the baby with the bathwater.

Britain has always been an enterprising country. Indeed, it was Napoleon Bonaparte who said, “England is a nation of shopkeepers”. Capitalism might be in something of a crisis, but no matter how hard some of the left might wish it, it’s not going to go away. As Labour carries out its policy reviews, therefore, Ed Miliband’s party must place a commitment to business at the heart of what it stands for. And it must develop new processes in its party organisation to facilitate a broader and deeper relationship with businesspeople.

Enterprise is not just about the City of London. In fact, ours is a country with nearly five million small businesses. Together, those businesses – cafes, confectioners and consultancies – employ some 14 million people. Enterprise isn’t about complex financial products or bankers’ bonuses – it’s about the small companies and independent traders who create the bulk of jobs and hold our communities together. It’s about building lives for people and their families and expanding opportunity. Business is at the core of what it means to be Labour.

And yet, in the debate about where Labour goes next, after the recession and the bitter 2010 election defeat, we have failed to set out a convincing vision for the future of our economy. We are letting the Tories take the lead. An Ipsos-Mori poll this autumn showed that only 23% of the public prefer Labour’s policies when it comes to managing the economy; 33% prefer Tory policies. That gap has increased by seven percentage points in 2011; we’ve lost a net 35 percentage points to the Tories since 2007.

It would only be a start, but firmly grasping enterprise, and placing a commitment to it at the heart of what we do as a party, will help claw back public opinion. The British public know that the way back to economic success as a nation will be found via the entrepreneurs among us. There is a huge amount of creativity and energy in this country which, given a little nudge, will produce strong growth and create the many thousands of jobs our economy now needs.

We live in an Internet age, where the barriers to entry to set up a company or to self-employment are lower than ever; that is a new economy which creates opportunities for many. But it is also a threat to others. Labour must understand and learn to provide for that new economy if it is to become relevant again.

That’s why we’re launching Labour’s Business today, a collection of thoughts a for how Labour can become the party of business in the twenty-first century. We’ve brought together successful business people, social entrepreneurs, tech providers, accountants, thinkers and public policy experts – people who have first hand experience of starting and running companies and of developing government delivery solutions – to make the case.

We’re publishing Labour’s Business now because we don’t believe that the Tories are the natural party of enterprise & business; in fact, it’s in Labour’s interest – and it should be at the heart of Labour values in this century – to promote and support self-employment and entrepreneurship. Our century puts the “means of production” in the hands of individuals – what could be more progressive, more empowering, more Labour than the opportunity to take control of one’s own economic future?

Alex Smith is former communications adviser to Ed Miliband, and editor of LabourList. He is a director at Future First, and a consultant for Champollion Digital.

Luke Bozier is a former communications adviser to the Labour Party and Tony Blair. He is currently setting up a Silicon Valley-backed cloud software company.

20111128-082550.jpg

  • Daniel Speight

    Alex and Luke do you believe the party still has a role in reforming capitalism and helping it along the path towards a system for a more equal society? If so, what sort of reforms would you like to see?

    If not do you see it as a party that should be more orientated towards the ideas of Adam Smith rather than Keir Hardie? If that is the case do you think we should change the name of the party? We could try Small Business Party instead of Labour Party couldn’t we?

  • Alex Smith

    Hi Daniel, 

    If you read the pamphlet you’ll see that what you say in your first sentence is indeed what we believe, and there are dozens of recommendations through the pamphlet on taxation, regulation, education, social enterprise and using the levers of local and national government to improve markets and make them work for people. I don’t see that there’s a conflict necessarily, or that trade unionism and support for small business are mutually exclusive. On the contrary, I think it’s vital that there are stronger relationships between trade unions and business and there are recommendations in the book for trade union representation on boards, for example.This collection is about making business relevant to Labour and Labour relevant to small business, because after all small enterprise employs millions of people in this country. I think it’s important to hear those voices, and to follow their ideas over those of historical and political figures, however massive those contributions have been.

    Hope you enjoy the pamphlet!

    Alex

  • Jonathan Roberts

    I completely agree.  As a party we know how to spend money, but spend far too little time figuring out how we can make it.  No wonder we always ends up running a high deficit.  I wish you well.

  • Anonymous

    Small businesses need demand for their goods and services and an easy supply of credit with which to expand.

    The only institution able to provide this is the state. Even Osborne has twigged this, with his credit easing and  mortgage indemnity scheme to get building moving.

    The state saved capitalism in 2008 and is the only guarantor of it’s future.

    But what sort of future for capitalism do we want? Free market capitalism is dead, Osborne’s actions prove it.
    The future is more state capitalism but this time it must be on behalf of the 99% not the 1%.

    Paul Hillyard

  • Jonathan Roberts

    I actually think  what we urgently need is people from a business background coming into Parliament for Labour.  We have shockingly few people (if any?!) who understand business from a practitioners’ perspective.

    It’s all well and good having the PLP filled with ex-charity and public sector workers – but we’ll never be the party of business and true economic growth until we have people who’ve been there and done it for themselves.

    • http://www.stuartbruce.biz Stuart Bruce

      It’s not just about getting people with a business background into the PLP, there are actually quite a lot. What Labour needs is more people who have been entrepreneurs as running and growing your own business gives a very different perspective than just working in one. We are fortunate that Labour’s new shadow minister for small business has actually run one, but we need more like him.

  • Anonymous

    Just ask Alex Smith, co-author of the report, and former Ed Miliband advisor. “Ed just doesn’t understand business,” Smith told me. “He’s not interested in it. He’s too academic.” Those around Miliband have, apparently, tried to light a pro-business spark 
    under their charge. Without much success. Smith says: “When I was working there we’d have business leaders coming in to meet him. But there was always something missing. They weren’t impressed.”

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danhodges/100120079/ed-miliband-just-doesn%E2%80%99t-understand-business-says-the-co-author-of-labours-new-pro-business-report/

Latest

  • News More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    Ed Miliband is addressing Google’s Bug Tent tomorrow, and is expected to attack them over tax avoidance. So the slick Downing Street operation presumably want to get out ahead of that, right? Not quite. Here’s a selection of the headlines from today’s papers: ‘Stop moralising about tax avoidance, PM told’ – Guardian p.23 ‘Tougher tax rules would cost jobs, minister warns’ – Financial Times p.3 ‘Cameron avoids showdown over Google tax row’ – Times p.15 ‘No taxing questions as PM [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Most people like to think that we live in a society that is fair and equal but for some it is still not equal at all. When it comes to TV presenters, women disappear when they reach over the age of 50. As part of the work of the Older Women’s Commission, I wrote to the six main UK broadcasters asking them how many older women they employ on screen and behind the camera. The figures provided by broadcasters show [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    That’s it. Enough is enough. I try to be reasonable. But you can only push somebody so far. It’s time to sort this out once and for all. I am fed up with this huge and growing army of sycophants and cheerleaders constantly bigging up Ed Miliband, and making helpful or supportive interventions on his behalf. The list is endless. Let’s shine a spotlight on the guilty men and women. There’s… well, there’s… er… you know… er… thingy… on a [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    Last Saturday a senior European politician wrote an article in the British press which made you want to shout at the computer screen. Not such an unusual event, you might think, but this was not a debater’s disagreement as one might have had with the viewpoint of a Tory, a Gaullist or a Christian Democrat. It was one which also left the reader feeling a bit nauseous. And that is because, rather than an honestly-expressed case justified with some evidence, it was [...]

    Read more →
  • News Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Labour proposes teachers spend time in industry “All teachers involved in vocational education would have to spend a period of each year in industry, under Labour plans to integrate further education with emerging skills gaps identified by businesses. The strategy – announced on [...]

    Read more →