Exclusive: “I couldn’t remain quiet and hope it goes away” – Ed Miliband on fighting back against the Mail

October 3, 2013 9:00 pm

I’ve just got back from interviewing Ed Miliband this evening. The main purpose for the interview was to talk about party reform ahead of his first major event on the subject in Liverpool tonight (of which more tomorrow morning), but understandably I wanted to speak to him briefly about the Mail furore that has been escalating day by day since the weekend. What he was particularly clear on – and will be fleshed out in media appearances tomorrow – is that he wanted to speak out on the smears now so that he can renew his focus on the cost of living crisis (especially tackling the big energy companies, which he’ll be talking about in the morning).

Whilst we were on the train a stream of well-wishers stopped by Miliband’s seat to wish him well (something I’m used to from interviewing Miliband on trains before) – but this time it was different. “Well done on the Mail, you’re on the right side there”, said one man before we’d even taken our seats. Eyes flickered up and down the carriage knowingly, and it was easy to overhear the whispers of “is that Ed Miliband?” throughout the journey. This issue seems to have caught the public’s imagination – and pushed Miliband further into the public spotlight.Mark F and ed M

My interview with Miliband on party reform will be up on LabourList tomorrow – but here’s what he had to say on recent events between him and the Daily Mail:

On how he felt about fighting back:

“It has been hard because this is about my family and it’s not a fight I picked. The Mail did that and I had to speak out to defend my Dad and to stand up for a better kind of political debate so the next election isn’t fought in the gutter. On Monday night I was thinking about the article I’d written and –  I don’t normally feel these kind of things – but I felt a sense of apprehension about it. I didn’t know they were going to compound the problem by describing my Dad’s legacy as ‘evil’ but even then I knew that even though I didn’t want to be in this position it was the right thing to do. You’ve got to draw the line somewhere. I thought it was right to speak out.”

On his relationship with the Mail:

“It certainly hasn’t improved our relationship. But you can’t judge these things on the basis of ‘how are we going to get favourable coverage?’ You’ve got to judge them on the basis of doing the right thing, and that’s what I thought in relation to what the Daily Mail did in smearing my Dad and that’s what I thought in relation to the Mail on Sunday sending a reporter to my uncle’s memorial. I did face a choice but I decided I couldn’t remain quiet and hope it goes away in the way politicians are supposed to do.

On the culture of the Mail:

“It’s the first time this has happened to me in this way, but many other people have been affected by this sort of practice and I’m serious about what I said in my letter to Lord Rothermere: he’s got to look into the culture and practice of the Mail and the Mail on Sunday. What we’ve seen over the past five days is a symptom of that and it’s time he took a long hard look at the way his papers are run because I don’t believe that reflects the values of the British people.”

“I want to know how these practices are allowed to happen. Not on the basis of being “one rogue reporter” or “one rogue editor”, but what is it about the culture and practice of the organisation that makes these kind of things acceptable? Because the decisions made by an individual in an organisation are shaped by the culture and practice of an organisation.”

On what he wants the next election to be about:

“It’s important for me to say this though – I want this next election to be about the cost of living not about smears on my late father. That is why I chose to speak out now because the British people need a debate about the issues which matter to them and that won’t be possible if this kind of character assassination of people’s families continues. Of course I expect criticism and I’m used to being attacked by The Mail and other newspapers. But this was different and if we’re going to have the robust debate Britain needs about who can tackle the cost of living crisis then it was important for me to speak out now. Tomorrow you’re going to hear me talking more about that cost of living crisis and how we will tackle the big energy companies so we can freeze bills for millions of ordinary families and businesses. That’s the real issue for families not smears by the Daily Mail. If we’re going to have those massive debates about the cost of living, we need to have proper standards of decency in our press.”

  • Hamish Dewar

    Ed Miliband was right to take the Mail to task and I believe people respect him for doing so. He is right now to put the matter behind him and let others pursue it (he did at least get an apology from the Editor of the Mail on Sunday) in order to focus on politically weightier matters.
    I look forward to hearing what he says about party reform, because he almost made a joke of the topic in his conference speech

    • leslie48

      As blogged before – apologies for repetition- this affair has really helped Ed no end & I heard several non-Labour voters saying as much over the last few days. The public have a sense of fair play & they know the fascist Mail went over board for what ? – some regulation of our fat profits utility companies whose dividends we regularly receive by cheque whilst some poor old soul turns off his radiators. The Mail are scared of Labour’s polling last week at 41% and they will do everything and I mean everything to stop him. All of this has been a political education for many people & including how journalists from the Economist defended the Mail earlier in the week. That’s another publication I shall not buy. The rich and powerful will hit Labour hard over the coming months as just occasionally their hegemony cracks and people get to see how the wealthy London mob run the UK.

  • James Masters

    Sorry but this is getting very tedious now. The article wasn’t even that bad and the reaction is way, way out of proportion. Give it a rest.

  • Mr Arthur Cook

    Please try to be balanced.
    The Daily Mail makes a contribution to the environment by replacing those polystyrene chip trays. How many tons of kitty litter have been conserved because of its multi-purpose pages.
    Just because its journalist can’t reach the heights of insight and eloquence of the Daily Sport its softness and absorbency surely count in its favour?

    • Danny

      It’s one of the best newspapers for stuffing your shoes after they’ve had a good soaking as well.

      • treborc1

        Would not know, have never bought it so have no use for it, not even for the dog mess.

  • Pingback: Miliband’s Forced “Decency” - Guy Fawkes' blog()

  • Pingback: The Daily Mail And Hitler | Soupy One()

  • Pingback: Miliband vs Mail reveals Labour leader's belief about the role of politicians » Spectator Blogs()

  • Pingback: Vultures are circling Britain's free press. Again. » Spectator Blogs()

Latest

  • News Latest London Mayor poll shows rise in support for Khan and Hodge, but Jowell still leads

    Latest London Mayor poll shows rise in support for Khan and Hodge, but Jowell still leads

    New polling for the London Mayoral race shows Tessa Jowell is still the most popular candidate among Labour supporters in London – and has even more support among Londoners as a whole. The retiring Dulwich and Norwood MP comes top of potential Labour candidates with 26%, no change from last month. When including non-Labour supporters, this figure rises to 28%. However, Shadow London minister Sadiq Khan has seen a boost in his support, rising eight points to 19%. This appears to have […]

    Read more →
  • Comment There’s no point criticising Stuart Broad without looking at the real issue at hand

    There’s no point criticising Stuart Broad without looking at the real issue at hand

    The ill-judged Twitter comments of England cricketer Stuart Broad tell us less about him and more about society’s need to focus on the issues that really matter. Given my openly stated wish to not just raise the minimum wage, as Labour has pledged to do, but to go further and implement the Living Wage, you may expect to hear me criticising the fast bowler. Well, I won’t be. His comment was certainly not his smartest move: “I’ve heard if you […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The values of our NHS should be at the heart of our economy

    The values of our NHS should be at the heart of our economy

    So we’re now within 100 days of the General Election. I bet most people outside the Westminster bubble won’t see it in those terms, or care, for that matter. In fact, they are probably already fed up with the constant TV coverage about it. For many people, ‘100 days’ simply means three more pay cheques where their basic outgoings exceed what they’re bringing in. It means three more calls to a payday lender to bridge the difference. It might even […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Kinnock calls for an end to “sniping from behind” following Milburn and Hutton comments

    Kinnock calls for an end to “sniping from behind” following Milburn and Hutton comments

    Lord Neil Kinnock has waded into the debate over Labour’s policy offer ahead of the general election and called for an end to internal fights within the party. He said was reluctant to enter into the current conversation but following interventions from people such as Tony Blair and Alan Milburn, Kinnock said their criticisms of Labour’s current strategy were ““so great that it requires a response”. This comes after Milburn along with John Hutton openly criticised Labour’s policy on the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Politicians who recognise that Cameron is wrong on immigration must have the conviction to say so

    Politicians who recognise that Cameron is wrong on immigration must have the conviction to say so

    On Tuesday, David Cameron said Britain would be a “better, stronger country” with fewer migrants. So, if you’re a migrant, sorry about that. I guess it’s off to the ferry terminal for you (that includes you too, Dad). I’m actually a little confused as to the acceptable discourse around migration. Apparently it’s totally ok, even welcome, for the Prime Minister to blithely observe that fewer migrants would be good for the country. But when Mark Reckless says UKIP would ask EU migrants to […]

    Read more →