Exclusive: “I couldn’t remain quiet and hope it goes away” – Ed Miliband on fighting back against the Mail

October 3, 2013 9:00 pm

I’ve just got back from interviewing Ed Miliband this evening. The main purpose for the interview was to talk about party reform ahead of his first major event on the subject in Liverpool tonight (of which more tomorrow morning), but understandably I wanted to speak to him briefly about the Mail furore that has been escalating day by day since the weekend. What he was particularly clear on – and will be fleshed out in media appearances tomorrow – is that he wanted to speak out on the smears now so that he can renew his focus on the cost of living crisis (especially tackling the big energy companies, which he’ll be talking about in the morning).

Whilst we were on the train a stream of well-wishers stopped by Miliband’s seat to wish him well (something I’m used to from interviewing Miliband on trains before) – but this time it was different. “Well done on the Mail, you’re on the right side there”, said one man before we’d even taken our seats. Eyes flickered up and down the carriage knowingly, and it was easy to overhear the whispers of “is that Ed Miliband?” throughout the journey. This issue seems to have caught the public’s imagination – and pushed Miliband further into the public spotlight.Mark F and ed M

My interview with Miliband on party reform will be up on LabourList tomorrow – but here’s what he had to say on recent events between him and the Daily Mail:

On how he felt about fighting back:

“It has been hard because this is about my family and it’s not a fight I picked. The Mail did that and I had to speak out to defend my Dad and to stand up for a better kind of political debate so the next election isn’t fought in the gutter. On Monday night I was thinking about the article I’d written and –  I don’t normally feel these kind of things – but I felt a sense of apprehension about it. I didn’t know they were going to compound the problem by describing my Dad’s legacy as ‘evil’ but even then I knew that even though I didn’t want to be in this position it was the right thing to do. You’ve got to draw the line somewhere. I thought it was right to speak out.”

On his relationship with the Mail:

“It certainly hasn’t improved our relationship. But you can’t judge these things on the basis of ‘how are we going to get favourable coverage?’ You’ve got to judge them on the basis of doing the right thing, and that’s what I thought in relation to what the Daily Mail did in smearing my Dad and that’s what I thought in relation to the Mail on Sunday sending a reporter to my uncle’s memorial. I did face a choice but I decided I couldn’t remain quiet and hope it goes away in the way politicians are supposed to do.

On the culture of the Mail:

“It’s the first time this has happened to me in this way, but many other people have been affected by this sort of practice and I’m serious about what I said in my letter to Lord Rothermere: he’s got to look into the culture and practice of the Mail and the Mail on Sunday. What we’ve seen over the past five days is a symptom of that and it’s time he took a long hard look at the way his papers are run because I don’t believe that reflects the values of the British people.”

“I want to know how these practices are allowed to happen. Not on the basis of being “one rogue reporter” or “one rogue editor”, but what is it about the culture and practice of the organisation that makes these kind of things acceptable? Because the decisions made by an individual in an organisation are shaped by the culture and practice of an organisation.”

On what he wants the next election to be about:

“It’s important for me to say this though – I want this next election to be about the cost of living not about smears on my late father. That is why I chose to speak out now because the British people need a debate about the issues which matter to them and that won’t be possible if this kind of character assassination of people’s families continues. Of course I expect criticism and I’m used to being attacked by The Mail and other newspapers. But this was different and if we’re going to have the robust debate Britain needs about who can tackle the cost of living crisis then it was important for me to speak out now. Tomorrow you’re going to hear me talking more about that cost of living crisis and how we will tackle the big energy companies so we can freeze bills for millions of ordinary families and businesses. That’s the real issue for families not smears by the Daily Mail. If we’re going to have those massive debates about the cost of living, we need to have proper standards of decency in our press.”

  • Hamish Dewar

    Ed Miliband was right to take the Mail to task and I believe people respect him for doing so. He is right now to put the matter behind him and let others pursue it (he did at least get an apology from the Editor of the Mail on Sunday) in order to focus on politically weightier matters.
    I look forward to hearing what he says about party reform, because he almost made a joke of the topic in his conference speech

    • leslie48

      As blogged before – apologies for repetition- this affair has really helped Ed no end & I heard several non-Labour voters saying as much over the last few days. The public have a sense of fair play & they know the fascist Mail went over board for what ? – some regulation of our fat profits utility companies whose dividends we regularly receive by cheque whilst some poor old soul turns off his radiators. The Mail are scared of Labour’s polling last week at 41% and they will do everything and I mean everything to stop him. All of this has been a political education for many people & including how journalists from the Economist defended the Mail earlier in the week. That’s another publication I shall not buy. The rich and powerful will hit Labour hard over the coming months as just occasionally their hegemony cracks and people get to see how the wealthy London mob run the UK.

  • James Masters

    Sorry but this is getting very tedious now. The article wasn’t even that bad and the reaction is way, way out of proportion. Give it a rest.

  • Mr Arthur Cook

    Please try to be balanced.
    The Daily Mail makes a contribution to the environment by replacing those polystyrene chip trays. How many tons of kitty litter have been conserved because of its multi-purpose pages.
    Just because its journalist can’t reach the heights of insight and eloquence of the Daily Sport its softness and absorbency surely count in its favour?

    • Danny

      It’s one of the best newspapers for stuffing your shoes after they’ve had a good soaking as well.

      • treborc1

        Would not know, have never bought it so have no use for it, not even for the dog mess.

  • Pingback: Miliband’s Forced “Decency” - Guy Fawkes' blog

  • Pingback: The Daily Mail And Hitler | Soupy One

  • Pingback: Miliband vs Mail reveals Labour leader's belief about the role of politicians » Spectator Blogs

  • Pingback: Vultures are circling Britain's free press. Again. » Spectator Blogs

Latest

  • Comment Europe McFadden’s appointment comes at a time of big opportunity for Labour on Europe

    McFadden’s appointment comes at a time of big opportunity for Labour on Europe

    Pat McFadden is taking over the Europe brief just at the time when the issue can work in Labour’s favour. Provided we hold to Ed Miliband’s decision not to cave in to the calls to offer an in-out referendum. Europe is again becoming toxic for the Tories. How Cameron must be looking back wistfully to that time when he told his party to stop banging on about Europe. That’s exactly what it is now doing. And it’s largely his own […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The Next Portillo Moment

    The Next Portillo Moment

    Undoubtedly the highlight of election night ‘97 was seeing Labour record the unlikeliest of victories where I live in Enfield Southgate. We did it through hard work, at the time all three Enfield seats were blue and though the Labour swing meant that Edmonton and Enfield North were going red regardless it took a special campaign lead by an extraordinarily good candidate in Stephen Twigg to record what was an iconic victory in the Party’s history. We held the seat […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The business backlash against Tory EU exit plans 

    The business backlash against Tory EU exit plans 

    It’s not just José Manuel Barroso who has warned David Cameron that his party is taking the wrong approach when it comes to talk of an EU exit. There is a clear sense of concern and anger from the UK and international business community in respect of the Tory plans for an in/out referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU in 2017. This has led to a serious business backlash against the Tories. Standard & Poor’s, the international rating […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Miliband sets out 5 point immigration reform plan (but won’t join “Operation Pander”)

    Miliband sets out 5 point immigration reform plan (but won’t join “Operation Pander”)

    Ed Miliband is in Rochester today, where he’s campaigning for the party’s by-election candidate Naushabah Khan against what he called the “two Tory opponents” of UKIP and the Tories in the Rochester and Strood by-election. But the main purpose of Miliband’s speech was to set out what Labour’s approach to immigration will be – specifically an Immigration Reform Bill in the first Queen’s Speech of the new Parliament. Miliband announced it’d be based around five key principles (most of which […]

    Read more →
  • News Sadiq Khan asks Mansion Tax critics – how would you fund the NHS?

    Sadiq Khan asks Mansion Tax critics – how would you fund the NHS?

    Since Labour conference, the majority of Labour’s potential London mayoral candidates have been critical of the party’s Mansion Tax proposals. However one presumptive candidate has been consistently positive about the plans – Sadiq Khan. That’s understandable and expected, as he’s a Shadow Cabinet member and a Miliband loyalist. But Khan has now launched a public defence of the tax (calling it “absolutely fair”) and a broadside against critics, asking them “why they are opposed to hiring thousands more nurses and doctors […]

    Read more →